Recent Posts



Your voice counts! Ask Congress to Protect RC Flying

RC aeromodeling is during a vicious juncture, and it’s critical for us all to join together so a inaugurated officials hear a common voice and strengthen a hobby. Below is a summary from a Academy of Model Aeronautics, and we titillate we to follow their instructions and hit your senators and member to let them know how critical RC drifting is to you.

AMA’s Areas of Concern Regarding a FAA Interpretive Rule for Model Aircraft
On Tuesday, Jun 24th AMA expelled a member warning expressing regard over some reserve in a FAA’s interpretation of a Special Rule for Model Aircraft determined by Congress in a FAA modernization and Reform Act of 2012. In that alert, we let members know that we would be following adult with today’s warning that explains AMA’s concerns in larger detail. We need we to take movement now and respond by Jul 25, 2014 to a FAA Interpretation of a Special Rule for Model Aircraft that was expelled Jun 23, 2014. The Academy has reviewed a order and is intensely unhappy and uneasy be a ensue a FAA has selected to take in regards to this issue. FAA’s Interpretive Rule To assistance we respond to a FAA, we have summarized AMA’s vital concerns in a bullets below. A some-more in-depth reason of a concerns can be found during AMA’s Concerns

  • Throughout a order a FAA takes good embodiment in last Congress’ intentions and in fixation firmly worded restrictions by a “plain-language” interpretation of a text.
  • The FAA uses a plain denunciation doctrine to emanate a regulatory breach of a use of a specific form of technology.
  • FAA’s overreaching interpretation of a denunciation in a Public Law is transparent in a rule’s interpretation of a requirement that indication aircraft be “flown particularly for hobby or recreational use.”
  • Although a FAA acknowledges that manned aviation flights that are immaterial to a business are not deliberate blurb underneath a regulations, a order states that indication aircraft flights flown immaterial to a business are not hobby or distraction related.
  • The order overlooks a law’s transparent goal to ring a ancillary aeromodeling attention underneath a sustenance of a Special Rule, “aircraft being grown as a indication aircraft.” The rule’s despotic interpretation of hobby contra business puts in doubt a activities of a principals and employees of a billion dollar attention that reserve and supports a hobby.
  • The Public Law states that when indication aircraft are, “flown within 5 miles of an airport, a user of a aircraft (must) provide(s) a airfield user and a airfield atmosphere trade control building (when an atmosphere trade trickery is located during a airport) with before notice of a operation. However a order indicates that capitulation of a airfield user is required. Although it is accepted that creation presentation to a airfield and/or ATC will open a dialog as to either a designed activity is protected to proceed, there is no vigilant in a law that this be a ask for accede on a partial of a indication aircraft pilot.
  • The Interpretive Rule establishes new restrictions and prohibitions to that indication aircraft have never been subject. This is opposite to a Public Law that reads, “The Federal Aviation Administration might not publicize any order or law per a indication aircraft or an aircraft being grown as a indication aircraft,…” if determined criteria are met.
  • The Interpretive Rule attempts to annul a whole Public Law by stating, “Other manners in partial 91, or other tools of a regulations, might request to indication aircraft operations, depending on a sold resources of a operation. This in and of itself creates indication aircraft enthusiasts accountable to a whole litany of regulations found in Title 14 of a Code of Federal Regulations, something that was never dictated by Congress and until now never compulsory by a FAA.

How to Respond to a FAA. All AMA members, family and friends need to take movement now to let a FAA know that this order significantly impacts a whole aeromodeling village and that this village is unaffected and committed to safeguarding a hobby. There are 4 methods to contention a comment. Emailing your criticism is a fastest and many available method. All comments contingency embody a calendar series FAA-2014-0396. Tips for submitting your comments. Email: Go to Follow a online instructions for promulgation your comments electronically. Mail: Send Comments to Docket Operations, M-30; US Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Hand Delivery: Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of a West Building Ground Floor during 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday by Friday, solely Federal holidays. Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply